<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Digital Camera Would You Recommend?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 05:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: selina_5</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>selina_5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>People so often ask: &quot;Which one is a good camera to buy?&quot;
Here is my 10 cents on the subject:
Point &amp; Shoot cameras are wonderfully handy because of their small size.
When light conditions are ideal, they even take really nice photos - all of them do.
However, they all DO have limitations - they don&#039;t do very well in low light situations  (i.e. noisy photos, hard to avoid blur, etc). The little onboard flash is very harsh at close range, and doesn&#039;t reach very far.
Many of them have no manual functions, so you are limited to only very basic photos, you can&#039;t compensate for unusual situations, or do many fun &quot;tricks&quot; and special effects.
P&amp;S&#039;s  also suffer from  frustrating shutterlag and many of them chew through batteries rather quickly.
However, if you&#039;re ok with all those limitations, then go ahead and pick one, most of them (the same type and same price range) are rather similar. Personally I would pick either a Canon or a Nikon, and would certainly stay away from Kodak. 
A higher end P&amp;S will give you more manual options and better quality.  Many of those even give you the option of adding a proper flash (which makes a big difference to your flash photos).
Don&#039;t worry too much about megapixels…. there is a limit to how many pixels you can squash into a tiny P&amp;S sensor before you actually LOSE quality rather than gain it.
Decide which features are important to you, and look for cameras that have that feature. 
Then go compare a few models on www.dpreview.com  .  
The very best thing you can do for your success is to borrow some books and learn about basic photography.  A bit of knowledge will make a much bigger difference to your photos than your choice of P&amp;S camera can.
If I was in the market for a high end P&amp;S,  I&#039;d pick the Canon PowerShot SX10 IShttp://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/contro…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People so often ask: &#8220;Which one is a good camera to buy?&#8221;<br />
Here is my 10 cents on the subject:<br />
Point &#038; Shoot cameras are wonderfully handy because of their small size.<br />
When light conditions are ideal, they even take really nice photos &#8211; all of them do.<br />
However, they all DO have limitations &#8211; they don&#8217;t do very well in low light situations  (i.e. noisy photos, hard to avoid blur, etc). The little onboard flash is very harsh at close range, and doesn&#8217;t reach very far.<br />
Many of them have no manual functions, so you are limited to only very basic photos, you can&#8217;t compensate for unusual situations, or do many fun &#8220;tricks&#8221; and special effects.<br />
P&#038;S&#8217;s  also suffer from  frustrating shutterlag and many of them chew through batteries rather quickly.<br />
However, if you&#8217;re ok with all those limitations, then go ahead and pick one, most of them (the same type and same price range) are rather similar. Personally I would pick either a Canon or a Nikon, and would certainly stay away from Kodak.<br />
A higher end P&#038;S will give you more manual options and better quality.  Many of those even give you the option of adding a proper flash (which makes a big difference to your flash photos).<br />
Don&#8217;t worry too much about megapixels…. there is a limit to how many pixels you can squash into a tiny P&#038;S sensor before you actually LOSE quality rather than gain it.<br />
Decide which features are important to you, and look for cameras that have that feature.<br />
Then go compare a few models on <a href="http://www.dpreview.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com</a>  .<br />
The very best thing you can do for your success is to borrow some books and learn about basic photography.  A bit of knowledge will make a much bigger difference to your photos than your choice of P&#038;S camera can.<br />
If I was in the market for a high end P&#038;S,  I&#8217;d pick the Canon PowerShot SX10 IShttp://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/contro…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomastm</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>thomastm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>Compact Digital cameras are designed to be small and portable; the smallest are described as subcompacts or &quot;ultra-compacts&quot;. Digital-cameras are usually designed to be easy to use, sacrificing advanced features and picture quality for compactness and simplicity; images can usually only be stored using Lossy compression (JPEG). Most have a built-in flash usually of low power, sufficient for nearby subjects.
I have the best &amp; cheapest  digital-camera that is of 2.1 MP high quality color image &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  http://www.agritura.com/product_info.php…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compact Digital cameras are designed to be small and portable; the smallest are described as subcompacts or &#8220;ultra-compacts&#8221;. Digital-cameras are usually designed to be easy to use, sacrificing advanced features and picture quality for compactness and simplicity; images can usually only be stored using Lossy compression (JPEG). Most have a built-in flash usually of low power, sufficient for nearby subjects.<br />
I have the best &#038; cheapest  digital-camera that is of 2.1 MP high quality color image >>>>>  <a href="http://www.agritura.com/product_info.php…" rel="nofollow">http://www.agritura.com/product_info.php…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mguide</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Mguide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>I am suggestion Canon digital camera, is a good quality can take good pictures.
See bestselling Canon digital camera at Amazon. (Price range $150-$250)http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?i…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am suggestion Canon digital camera, is a good quality can take good pictures.<br />
See bestselling Canon digital camera at Amazon. (Price range $150-$250)<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?i…" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?i…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regall</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>regall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Sony Cybershot DSC-T77 
10.1-megapixel Super HAD CCD captures enough detail for photo-quality 8 x 10-inch prints 
4x optical zoom with Optical SteadyShot image stabilization; Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar lens 
3-inch widescreen, touch-panel Clear Photo LCD Plus; Intelligent Scene Recognition 
Face Detection technology (up to 8 faces); Smile Shutter technology 
15MB built-in memory; compatible with Memory Stick media
Price: $279.99 + $6.17 shipping  
reference: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-DSC…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony Cybershot DSC-T77<br />
10.1-megapixel Super HAD CCD captures enough detail for photo-quality 8 x 10-inch prints<br />
4x optical zoom with Optical SteadyShot image stabilization; Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar lens<br />
3-inch widescreen, touch-panel Clear Photo LCD Plus; Intelligent Scene Recognition<br />
Face Detection technology (up to 8 faces); Smile Shutter technology<br />
15MB built-in memory; compatible with Memory Stick media<br />
Price: $279.99 + $6.17 shipping<br />
reference: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-DSC…" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Cybershot-DSC…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssss G</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>ssss G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>Samsung landiao will be okhttp://www.toboc.com/forum3/DEFAULT.ASPX…http://www.toboc.com/forum3/DEFAULT.ASPX…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung landiao will be okhttp://www.toboc.com/forum3/DEFAULT.ASPX…http://www.toboc.com/forum3/DEFAULT.ASPX…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klancene</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>klancene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>We have a great selection at http://cameras.santasgiftsallyear.com that are free! Just complete a few offers and refer a few friends and the camera of your choice will be sent to your door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a great selection at <a href="http://cameras.santasgiftsallyear.com" rel="nofollow">http://cameras.santasgiftsallyear.com</a> that are free! Just complete a few offers and refer a few friends and the camera of your choice will be sent to your door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iSmile (:</title>
		<link>http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php/comment-page-1#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>iSmile (:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameras2u.net/which-digital-camera-would-you-recommend.php#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>Olympus FE-210
works very well and has many features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olympus FE-210<br />
works very well and has many features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

