- 12.1-megapixel resolution for photo-quality prints up to 16 x 20 inches
- 24x optical wide-angle (35mm equivalent focal length: 26-624mm) Zoom-Nikkor ED glass lens
- 3.0-inch Vari-Angle LCD and Electronic Viewfinder
- Nikon’s Smart Portrait System; Red-eye Fix, Face Priority AE and more
- Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)
Product Description12. 1-megapixel effective recording * 24X optical zoom (4X digital/96X total zoom) * optical image stabilization with vibration reduction * 3″ LCD screen with anti-reflective coating and 5-level brightness adjustment * real-image electronic viewfinder * wide-angle lens for shooting landscapes and large groups * 35mm equivalent focal length: 26-624mm * top JPEG resolution: 4000 x 3000 * continuous sports mode for shooting up to 45 frames at 15 frames per second * variable ISO (film speed equivalent) settings including a high sensitivity mode (ISO 6400) for low-light and flash-free shooting * face priority autofocus for better portraits * smile shutter and blink alert for capturing ideal expressions * in-camera automatic red-eye correction * D-Lighting mode brightens dark areas of recorded images *
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
I`m glad with my new Nikon camera purchased at amazon. it is what I expected when I bought it.
Rating: 5 / 5
Nikon P90, Kodak Z980 and Pentax X70 are made by the même Chinese company. Sold under différentes marks, each of the three cameras is almost identical (with minor différences, like Kodak with the hot shoe, etc). If you want to buy this, buy that which you can find best the marché. Généralement Canon SX10 is better.
Estimate: 3/5
The price is ridiculous for this camera. My old $150 point and shoot was far better than this camera. The noise is absolutely horrible with this camera. You even get noise in your videos. Sure, it zooms a lot. But all that zooming reduces the quality SO much that it just turns out being a horrible photo. NOT recommended. Go buy $200 camera instead. For the same price, you can get a Canon SX10 which is better by far.
Rating: 2 / 5
This camera takes the large photographs, it& #039; a good number of flexibility obtained by S, the buzz is large and it& #039; S enough intuitive to employ. What I didn& #039; T like and was a breaker d' business for me was time 2. The first was relatively minor, but when I connect l' camera with my iMac, that takes with iPhoto approximately 3 minutes to identify the device thus I can download my photographs. For the comparison, when I connect my EOS from Canon, l' identification is almost instantaneous. The second exit is that the flash does not jump automatically open when together on automatic. You must manually jump to the top the flash whereas l' camera will put fire at the flash with the need based on your arrangements. This simply n' is any good for me and was the primary reason that I l' returned in favour of Sony CyberShot DSC-HX1. Until d' quality; image, the two cameras produced the images which were proportioned for my needs and I regard as being these two cameras category of pastime/occasional user. With granted Sony is two hundred dollars moreover, but now that j' have Sony, me l' like better and feel it& #039; a much better camera of SA with more configurations than P90. Until Sony against Nikon, my feeling is that before numerical cameras, it was all about the optical system and Nikon was probably the chief in the optical system d' camera of 35mm. L' objective was the only thing between your image and your film and more your objective were better, plus your image could be better. Maintaining in the numerical world it& #039; S all about the processor and less about the optical system. I believe that Sony being a company d' electronics upwards has a leg in this sector. Look at the cameras of d' quality; emission of HD, Sony has this market. What qu' it arrives, if you could live with l' instantaneous exit, Nikon would be a large camera and you would save a certain sum d' money above Sony to initialize. If the price n' is not d' as much; a consideration, with Sony, I go feel that the additional devices are worth l' money, particularly the panoramic field and visual modes of HD.
Estimate: 3/5
Image quality sucks bad. Lots of noise. Poor quality.
I bought this the day it came out as a gift. The view finder screen is so pixilated it seems like the 80′s were making a comeback.
The images when transferred faired no better. I got a few okay pictures under great lighting conditions. Anything near bad light with a flash looked like it was taken with a cell phone camera. I returned the camera right away.
Rating: 1 / 5